Last week we were invited to share our thoughts on the Governmentâs new tweaks to paternity leave. Our Deputy Chief Exec Dr Jeremy Davies told BBC TV News, the Radio 4 Today Programme, BBC 5 Live and others that the changes were âan insult to Britainâs familiesâ.
The UKâs statutory paternity offer, the least generous in Europe, gives eligible fathers just two weeksâ leave, paid at a statutory pay rate so low that it costs an average earning dad more than ÂŁ1k to take two weeks off, compared to what heâd earn if he stayed working. Around one in five fathers arenât even eligible, because theyâre self-employed, not classed as an employee, or have changed jobs within the previous ten months.
What are the new changes introduced by Government?Â
The Governmentâs changes mean that from April, fathers will be able to split the leave into two blocks, wonât have to give so much notice before they take it, and will get ÂŁ11.55 more per week in statutory paternity pay (up from ÂŁ172.48 to £184.03 per week). These are minor amendments to a system in serious need of reform.
Â
![chart showing paternity leave in european countries](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/efff1d_d2ebf3ce9e1e4f62b19cd8eeb8072771~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_67,h_50,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/efff1d_d2ebf3ce9e1e4f62b19cd8eeb8072771~mv2.png)
The timing of the new rules, in the week of both International Womenâs Day and Motherâs Day, could hardly have been more ironic.
Â
The Tories have just chosen to miss a huge opportunity to get behind involved fatherhood â an undeniable social good that matters not just for fathers themselves, but for mothers and gender equality too â and, crucially, for babies. Research shows that when fathers take leave in their babyâs first year, theyâre more likely to become and stay involved as hands-on caregivers; and that when this happens, mothers get back to work earlier, couples are more likely to stay together, and children do better.
![couple with young toddler chatting together](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/efff1d_308cc4ce24894635a24f940991f794e2~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/efff1d_308cc4ce24894635a24f940991f794e2~mv2.jpg)
Unbelievably, it took five years for the Business & Trade Department to come up with todayâs amendments, despite good evidence that the current system fails to meet familiesâ needs â not to mention those of a modern, forward-thinking society with a low and falling birth rate.
Â
In two separate responses (one to our open letter, and another to our petition - signed by more than 14,000 people across the UK), theyâve told us that if fathers want to take more time off, they can use shared parental leave. But only 1% of eligible mothers and 5% of eligible fathers use SPL, because itâs paid at the same derisory rate as paternity leave, and because fathersâ ability to access the leave depends on their partner giving up some of hers.
Â
On pay, the Government has clearly decided that responsibility for funding parenting leave should rest firmly with employers; it describes statutory paternity pay as a âfloor not a ceilingâ, despite that floor now representing less than half the National Living Wage.
Â
How are employers engaging with this issue?
Can we rely on private companies to âdo the right thingâ for dads? Some certainly do, as a growing number of organisations step in to fill the gap in statutory provision by introducing âgold standardâ offers, like 26 weeksâ leave on full pay for all parents, regardless of gender. But most can't afford to â and sometimes those who could, get things spectacularly wrong. Â
Â
Enter Severn Trent, which has raised more than a few eyebrows with its shiny new leave policy: for mothers, 52 weeksâ maternity leave at full pay and for fathers, 2 weeks. Thatâs quite the Motherâs Day present, if youâre into 1950s-style family roles. If youâre a fan of gender-equitable parentingâŚnot so much.Â
We could criticise the company for failing to invest more creatively in paternal as well as maternal caregiving. But like most UK employers, the company has simply followed the Governmentâs lead on the amount of leave parents can take, and amplified the gender inequality baked into the statutory system by committing to paying them at 100% salary.
![group of people at work in office](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/efff1d_b54e1fbce4ea41c6bf10d26c00ba2250~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/efff1d_b54e1fbce4ea41c6bf10d26c00ba2250~mv2.jpg)
This is exactly why we need a statutory system that creates a more equitable basis for employer enhancement. We shouldnât be reliant on individual employers â especially those without the resources to innovate in this area â to create paternity, maternity and parental leave offers that meet their staffâs needs and deliver on crucial social policy objectives, like gender equality and the best outcomes for children.
What are we doing about it?
Weâve been doing a lot of thinking about this over recent weeks, as we work out a long-term strategy for our campaign for a statutory paternity offer that includes 6 weeksâ well-paid leave for fathers, paid at 90% of their average weekly earnings.
Â
Labour â the party tipped to form the next government â has yet to commit to anything very specific on parenting leave reform, and seems unlikely to do so in the run-up to the General Election. For their part, the Tories have made emphatically clear they donât plan to change their tune, and are going down the âleave it to market forcesâ route.
Â
![father holding his baby in his arms](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/efff1d_f2530d7e2f044fc58208e809066aaace~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/efff1d_f2530d7e2f044fc58208e809066aaace~mv2.jpg)
So we expect to have to play a long game to achieve our goals. That means doing what we can to lobby for change in the corridors of power both before and after the election â but also building a solid base for our campaign, through deeper engagement with parents held back by the current system, and with employers and advocacy organisations who share our vision. Our recent experiences of campaigning on this issue suggest that there are now plenty out there.Â
We'll be building our campaign over the coming weeks, and we look forward to speaking to as many of you as possible. Do please feel free to share your thoughts via this form or by emailing Jeremy at j.davies@fatherhoodinstitute.org. Sign up for our newsletters and follow us on social media to make sure you keep up with the campaign.